Shropshire Beekeepers' Association

Newsletter : February 2005

 

1. Editorial

On your behalf I attended the BBKA Annual Delegates Meeting in January. Some notes on this appear elsewhere in the Newsletter but it is worth drawing one of the major concerns discussed there to your attention again. This is the ongoing campaign to persuade the Government to reconsider the proposed 20% cut to the funding of the NBU. The debate is still going on and the BBKA Executive has a further meeting with the officials involved in about two weeks time. There is still a hope that these cuts might not have to be as harsh as has so far been indicated. BBKA therefore wants its members (over 9,000 now!) to continue to put pressure on ministers via their own MPs by writing and pointing out the damage that these cuts could inflict by reducing the size of the seasonal inspectorate. Here is a reminder of the main points:

Write to: Matthew Green (Ludlow) Owen Paterson (North Shropshire)
David Wright (Telford) Paul Marsden (Shrews. & Atcham)
Peter Bradley (Wrekin)

Address: House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA

 

2. Next Meeting

The meeting on 9th February features Celia Davis from Warwick. Mrs. Davis is well known nationally, both as a speaker and as a regular contributor to 'BeeCraft' on a wide variety of topics. Many of you will remember her talk to us about 15 months ago on the topic of bee-friendly plants, which she illustrated with some excellent slides. Since then she has published her new book on the anatomy and physiology of the honeybee (The Honey Bee Inside Out) and is due to talk to us on Drone Behaviour - a topic that we probably don't give as much attention to as we should. We can guarantee an informative and interesting evening. Venue: the Rosa Room at Radbrook College: time 7.30 p.m.

Looking ahead to March our meeting then will be addressed by Pam Gregory, the Secretary of the Charity 'Bees Abroad', who will talk about Adventures in African Beekeeping.

Every meeting is rounded off with refreshments and a raffle - and of course, opportunities to share experiences and problems with fellow enthusiasts.

 

3. Indoor Meeting January 2005

We were addressed by Albert Knight, the former Groups Secretary for BIBBA (Bee Improvement and Bee Breeders' Association), which is an organisation dedicated to persuading English beekeepers to move back to a reliance on apis mellifera mellifera (amm.), the British dark honey bee rather than on imports from elsewhere in Europe. The reasons for doing this have been well rehearsed in these pages and elsewhere but in brief they are that the British bee is best suited to our particular climate both in terms of its nectar gathering properties and its physical resilience. In addition, the importation of foreign queens, often because they are thought to have a more gentle temperament, is a false benefit because second-generation hybrid crosses (which inevitable arise as the first born queens interbreed with native drones) tend to be much more aggressive than the British bee.

Mr. Knight began by describing what happens in other European countries. Many of them have been much more rigorous than us in planning and implementing their bee breeding programmes and consequently now have standards for breeding queens that are carefully monitored and widely accepted. He then went on to describe work done by BIBBA members that showed that the establishment of amm., while needing much time and effort, is far from an impossible dream. In the last part of his presentation Mr Knight described a number of useful practical solutions that his group had found to some of the problems that arise in running such a bee-breeding programme. Even the most experienced beekeepers present learned much to interest and intrigue them. He well deserved his round of applause at the end and thanks are also due to John Perkins for arranging this meeting at short notice.

 

4. BBKA Annual Delegates Meeting: January 2005

Reference has been in the Editorial to one of the issues raised at the ADM and in a card vote 8,500 members gave strong support to a proposal encouraging the BBKA in its current discussions with DEFRA over the cuts to the National; Bee Unit. Another item of note was that the concern being expressed about EU proposals to make all bee 'medicines' (e.g. Bayverol etc) available only from a Vet may be premature. While bees are being classified as food producing animals, which would bring them into the scope of such a proposal, it is still possible to exempt certain specific treatments from the rules. This would mean that named substances could continue to be sold as they are now by the usual suppliers. It was also noted that if this requirement is eventually published as a 'directive' rather than a 'regulation' then member states could choose to ignore it. Intense lobbying is continuing on this issue.

As far as BBKA business was concerned, there were 9 other proposals from member Associations. Two about financial organization, another about how meetings are timetabled and a third about Life Membership were briefly discussed but the decisions were to maintain the status quo. Two other issues were withdrawn or referred back to the Executive Committee. Support was given to a proposal to carry out a feasibility study into the development of a national queen-rearing registration project. There was an interesting discussion on giving advice to Associations about how to meet the requirements of the Disability Discrimination Act in respect of providing access to beekeeping events. This is clearly a complex matter and reservations were expressed about how useful such guidelines could be.

The most heated debate was on a proposal that BBKA should end the financial relationship they have with various companies arising from endorsing agricultural chemicals that could be toxic to bees. Strong views for and against this proposal were expressed - as they have been on a number of previous occasions. In the end the outcome was that 13 voted for the proposal, 30 against and 6 abstained. A fuller report of the proceedings of the ADM will appear in the BBKA's own Newsletter soon.

 

5. Committee Meeting

The Committee met very recently and discussed a number of issues including the Constitution, plans for summer activities, future speakers, the website and the BBKA ADM (reported on elsewhere). A fuller account of the meeting will be published next month but there were three points to which it would be helpful to have a more immediate response.

A reminder from Steve Watkins that anyone interested in being part of an email forum to share topics of interest should email him at (sw.arm@virgin.net).

A request from Maxie Sinclair for raffle prizes. Every month Maxie organises a raffle at our meetings that helps to bring in some additional funding to cover our costs. She is beginning to run out of things from her own sources and need support from others. So, please bring items along to the meetings that you could donate to the raffle and so help the Association.

A member has suggested that the Association buy a 1000 litre tank of sugar syrup from Thorne's for resale to members. The Committee feels that at £800 this is impractical - previous experience with the bulk purchase of Bayverol (much of which was left unsold) is not a good omen. However it might be possible to buy 5 litre buckets of the syrup from Thorne's at the BBKA convention on behalf of members if there was a demand. If you would like to take advantage of this offer please contact the Editor (terms: cash with order (£8.75 per bucket), deadline end of March for delivery after the Convention.

 

6. Those busy bees -Brian Gant looks at bee behaviour

[This is the first extract of an article originally published in Devon BKA's 'Beekeeping', July 2004. The second part, with reading references, will appear next month. Reproduced here courtesy of BEES]

But how busy are they, and what are they actually doing? One of the earliest observations came in 1855 when Donhoff requeened a colony of black bees with a yellow queen and observed her offspring. He saw yellow bees flying on their eleventh day of adult life but not foraging until the fifteenth. However, when ten days old they were seen in the brood area and building comb.

Later researchers used observation hives, with marked bees and much patience. Thus in 1925 Rosch worked with a 6-frame observation hive in which individual workers were marked as they emerged. Briefly summarised he concluded that the newly emerged workers cleaned cells in the brood nest and then at about three days moved on to feeding older larvae. When about a week old they fed young larvae and soon after started receiving nectar from foragers. At about this time they took their first flight, and a few days later some of them started foraging.

Rosch proposed that all workers went through this sequence with variation in the length of time spent on each task to suit the needs of the colony. These results, and other similar ones, were a valuable first shot at understanding the busyness of the bees. But it is not clear how much the results are affected by the use of a small colony, where the behaviour may not be typical, as well as by the difficulty of recording the activities of individual bees for prolonged periods.

About 50 years ago Lindauer started work by observing the activities of one marked bee for long periods over 24 days, and of another marked bee that was watched continuously, day and night, for her eight days of adult life. The result of these observations was to suggest that there is no clear sequence of hive duties, although one could consider three phases: a short period of cleaning duties, mostly in the first week; then a variety of work in the hive; followed by the final phase as a forager. But with much variation; one marked bee was seen back on cell cleaning work at the age of 22 days; the full range of activities spread across almost the whole of this worker's life, except for foraging.

An interesting feature of these observations is that the individual worker's main activity was 'resting'. On one day this took up 70% of her time and averaged about one-third of the time for which she was being watched. Another third of the time was spent in 'patrolling', walking around the hive but not obviously doing anything. We should remember that for some of this 'resting' time the bee's hypopharyngeal glands may have been producing brood food, or the wax glands making scales, so 'resting' may not be a fair description.

The ability of an individual bee to perform particular tasks depends on the development of the relevant glands. The hypopharyngeal glands will produce brood food for feeding larvae or the queen, or they will produce the enzymes used for processing nectar into honey; but clearly not both at the same time. However, there is no simple fixed sequence of glandular development.

Experiments with very unbalanced colonies - many young bees or many old ones -show that the glands can be adjusted to produce what is required; older workers can reactivate their hypopharyngeal glands to produce brood food if that is necessary, though the transition takes a few days. These glandular changes are associated with the level of juvenile hormone circulating in the bee; this in turn must be influenced by the bee environment.

So Lindauer suggested that the reason for the patrolling activity was to influence the bee according to the current needs of the colony. The exception to all this is foraging, which is limited to the older bees, who do not get significantly involved in tasks within the hive. Foraging is the most dangerous activity and so is limited to the bees who are near the end of their lives and will not perform any of the essential in-hive duties. Ribbands considers that exchange of food by bees within the hive (trophallaxis), also has a part to play in making workers aware of the current needs.

More recent work has been reported by Seeley, who considers that in a normal, balanced colony there is a steady progression of glandular changes apparently linked to a steady increase in the level of juvenile hormone in the blood and a corresponding development in the work done.

 

7. Round & About

Ludlow & District BKA: AGM Saturday 12 February, 2.30 p.m. at the Bishop Mascall Centre, Ludlow. Details: Andy Vanderhook Tel: 01299 841379

Stafford Bee Group: Thursday March 3rd: 7.45 p.m. Count Staff Club, Eastgate Street : Health Night-A short talk on disease with examination of dead bees brought in by members. Details: Tony Burton Tel: 01785 663340

North Shropshire BKA: Tuesday 15th February 7.30 p.m. Talk on Exomite Apis - alternative varroa treatment - (Clive Newitt) The Raven, Tilley. Details: Mike Harris Tel: 01939 232302

 

Return to Newsletters Menu